wcampbel at botbay.net
Sat Sep 27 11:54:58 EDT 2003
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Lee H wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:23:39AM -0400, W. Campbell wrote:
> > It appears 1.2-3 doesn't accept MODE changes from unopped users in the
> > channel. 1.2-2 did (I tested it locally). Sentinel's .op was
> > dependent on an undocumented quirk, rather than doing the right thing.
> > The issue you saw likely only happened when the admin client was not
> > opped, am I right?
> Hm, are we bouncing mode changes from unopped clients now?
> We shouldnt be, and I cant see anything in the ChangeLog that wouldve
> altered it directly between 1.2-2 and 1.2-3.. (cant see anything
> indirect either)
>From a telnet server, SJOIN'ing into an existing channel, It accepts
the modes. In the case of Sentinel's .op, the admin client SJOIN'ed
in with the current TS, to a channel that already existed, so it got
deopped. Then when it sent :admin MODE #channel +o target, it
was ignored. Could the deopped flag not be reset?
More information about the ircd-ratbox